Re: Call for Votes (Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Call for Votes (Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)"):
> -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [1] Choice X: Do not use rule 9, overrule maintainer, etc., as above.
> [3] Choice S: Sort IPv4 addrs according to rule 9 in getaddrinfo
> [2] Choice F: Further discussion
> -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
Subject: Call for Votes (Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:01:50 +0100
Ie, 20 Sep 2007 18:01:50 UTC
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Call for Votes (Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:44:13 -0500
Ie, 28 Sep 2007 04:44:13 UTC
Voting periods are one week, so I think that vote came too late.
It wouldn't have changed the result anyway.
> Sorry for the delay; I have been swamped at work.
That's OK. One reason there are several of us with a lowish quorum is
to cope with that kind of thing.
I look forward to hearing from Steve and AJ what they would like to
discuss ...
Ian.
Reply to: