Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
Anthony Towns writes ("Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main"):
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:39:01PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Anthony Towns writes ("Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main"):
> > > [draft resolution]
> > I'm afraid I think that that's quite out of order.
> > Constitution s6.3(3):
> > 3. Public discussion and decision-making.
> > Discussion, draft resolutions and amendments, and votes by
> > members of the committee, are made public on the Technical
> > Committee public discussion list. There is no separate secretary
> > for the Committee.
>
> The "tweaks" stuff were "draft resolutions" too, though... I don't see how
> it's feasible to have the rule be we can't do drafting work here, rather
> than just be "any drafting work we do here has no constitutional meaning".
Our discussions, which include drafting work, are supposed to be
public. The Committee isn't supposed to hide in secret and then come
out with decisions. `Discussion .... [is] made public ...'.
The `tweaks' stuff is to do with how the committee operates, and was
similar enough to the question of appointments (which we can discuss
in secret) that I let it slide.
Ian.
Reply to: