Re: (forw) [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: Posting on the list [email@example.com: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]
Ian Jackson (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> > As I say, it _used to_ be open to all. The spam volume was very high
> > indeed - much more mail than the legitimate traffic.
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 07:47:48PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> That sucks, should be fixed, maybe it's better now? I know we've done
> lots of updates for SPAM handling and whatnot.
Looking at the list archives, I see more spam in 2002 than we're
currently getting. I don't know if anyone has been manually removing
spam from the archives.
> Do other people on the committee feel this way?
I can probably live with things the way they are now, as far as spam
I think making sure that all "debian-ctte" mail gets read (as opposed
to silently going someplace no one reads) is a much higher priority.
[I don't know if any of those problems are outstanding.]