Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671

To: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Cc: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org, leader@debian.org
Subject: Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671
From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:32:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 15562.32293.309389.42407@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020427043959.GA18995@azure.humbug.org.au>
References: <E16yPU5-0003mI-00@azure.humbug.org.au> <handler.s.C.101918849522232.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 20020419060411.GC6319@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 15561.61970.45933.212006@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20020427043959.GA18995@azure.humbug.org.au>

Anthony Towns writes ("Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671"):
> It's not clear to me why tech-ctte discussions seem to not get cc'ed to
> the appropriate bug number properly. See also the discussion for the
> pcmcia-cs bug, much of which happened on the list rather than in the
> bug report.

Bug reports are not a particularly good medium for extensive
discussion, because they're harder to navigate than mailing list
archives.  It's not like the discussion isn't accessible, starting
from the bug log - you can just go and read it in the debian-ctte
archives.

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Processed: yawn
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Release-critical bugs, and #97671
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?
Next by Date: Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671
Previous by thread: Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671
Next by thread: Re: Release-critical bugs, and #97671
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread