Re: 关于CJK的新包
Hi!
> > The latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-* packages do not provide the TTF: at
> > build time, it uses the TTF provided by the Debian packages.
> Of course. As the .pfb files already have the outline of the glyphs,
> there is no point shipping the .ttf file. I suppose tfm-arphic-*
> packages ship the .ttf file because it need it to genenrate the PK files
> on the fly, although the .ttf file is probably just a symlink (as I
> said, I was lazy and didn't check :-).
Heh, yes, I just go to the "build/" directory and use a soft link to
the four TrueType Fonts instead. tfm-arphic-* uses the same
procedure, just as you described.
> > > Also since I am asking lazy questions - I've heard inquiries on IRC
> > > about why your packages are arch:i386 (which is essentially arch:any)
> > > instead of arch:all. Would you please explain that (or, if you've
> > > already explained in your package, just tell me which package to look
> > > at. :-)
> > Interesting. I didn't really know what architecture I had to use, and
> > it seemed reasonable to me to use "any". The Debian source package
> > "cjk" needs to compile a few programs, so I suppose that it's "any" or
> > "i386".
> A package seldom needs to specify arch:i386. Architecture dependent
> packages should just use arch:any, while architecture independent
> packages should use arch:all. More information can be found at:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture
I see! Thanks, I forgot to check the Debian Policy about this
matter.
> > As far as the font packages are concerned, yes, perhaps arch:all
> > would be a better choice indeed. I'll change it for
> > latex-cjk-chinese-arphic and latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab. Thanks for
> > the tip.
> Yeah, that sounds right. I'll defintitely check this when I try out
> your packages (which should be soon), since it seems you need help on
> this area. :-)
Thanks. IANAP(rogrammer), and am absolutely ignorant about hardware
specs, so any help here would indeed be most welcome. :)
I also don't really know when to put things in either binary-indep or
binary-arch in debian/rules, but ItWorks(tm), or at least seems to. ;D
> P.S.: I'm subscribed to the list, so no need to cc: me, thanks.
Heh, me too. Sorry. I'm used to receive and send CC's all the time;
I just press the "d" key to delete them in Mew. ;D
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
I didn't read Debian's code of conduct for mailing lists before.
Thanks for the link.
Kind regards
Danai SAE-HAN
韓達耐
--
题目:《棋》
作者:王安石（１０２１－１０８６）
莫将戏事扰真情，且可随缘道我赢。
战罢两奁分白黑，一枰何处有亏成。
Reply to: