Re: Is there a de facto standard Chinese PostScript font name?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:55:04PM +0800, ha shao wrote:
>
> Font is not a problem in this case. Mr. Yoshihiro Take's GS-CJK can make use of
> the arphic (or any) ttf fonts for ps printing. It is the postscript font name
> that is the problem. We want to find a default font name for Chinese postscript
> font so that PS files created on CLE, Turbolinux chinese, Debian ... can
> interchanged and printed without problems.
I'm with Cosmos on this. I do not know if you guys will eventually
find this default font name or not. However one thing I do know: this
so called "default font name" is not exist on my computer, nor on yours.
It's not in CLE, not in Turbolinux chinese, not in Debian. It's probably
not exist in anyone's daily use. Then why we are so interested about it?!
I think a better idea is to devise a naming convention for the existing
fonts.
Regards,
rigel
--
| This message was re-posted from debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org
| and converted from gb2312 to big5 by an automatic gateway.
Reply to: