Re: A third unsatisfied 2.1_r3 dependency: alpha sendmail --> libc6.1(>= 2.1)

To: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au>
Cc: debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A third unsatisfied 2.1_r3 dependency: alpha sendmail --> libc6.1(>= 2.1)
From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
Date: 08 Sep 1999 01:03:07 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87g10q9sn8.fsf@sheikh.hands.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.OSF.4.05.9909080918000.9573-100000@azure.dstc.edu.au> (jason andrade's message of "Wed, 8 Sep 1999 09:23:37 +1000 (EST)")
References: <[🔎] 87iu5ol2fb.fsf@sheikh.hands.com> <[🔎] Pine.OSF.4.05.9909080918000.9573-100000@azure.dstc.edu.au>

jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au> writes:

> i'm just starting to update the 2.1_r3 iso images here and noticed
> that the source cds have not changed at all - is this correct ?

<shuffles feet>

Looks like I cocked up, and failed to generate source CDs.

Watch this space (I'm waiting for enlightenment from Steve McIntyre ;-)

In the mean time, I've moved the source directory back under 2.1_r2 to
try and make it clear what's occurring.

Cheers, Phil.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: A third unsatisfied 2.1_r3 dependency: alpha sendmail --> libc6.1(>= 2.1)
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: A third unsatisfied 2.1_r3 dependency: alpha sendmail --> libc6.1(>= 2.1)
  - From: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: A third unsatisfied 2.1_r3 dependency: alpha sendmail --> libc6.1(>= 2.1)
Next by Date: Distro additions: Alma, Elegant, Sather.
Previous by thread: Re: A third unsatisfied 2.1_r3 dependency: alpha sendmail --> libc6.1(>= 2.1)
Next by thread: Missing md5sum file
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread