Re: Bug#656383: undeclared file conflict with systemtap-sdt-dev_1.6-1
El 19 de gener de 2012 17:20, Timo Juhani Lindfors
<email@example.com> ha escrit:
> Robert Millan <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> As systemtap-sdt-dev is a Linux-specific package, there's no point in
>> trying to make it installable on GNU/kFreeBSD, as it shouldn't be
>> available there in first place.
> Thanks for the report.
> I guess we should make systemtap-sdt-dev, systemtap-doc and
> systemtap-common "Architecture: linux-any".
For binary-all packages we usually don't care, since it's so common
(also for linux architectures) and the impact is small. However in
case of systemtap-sdt-dev it creates the perception that it can be
used unconditionally as build-dependency.