Re: kfreebsd-9 in experimental?
Darko Hojnik wrote:
> Am 15.06.2011, 19:51 Uhr, schrieb Robert Millan <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > Would this be a good time to put kfreebsd-9 in experimental?
> I don't think so. They is more then enough to do with the kfreebsd 8.
> Arno told me at the last Linuxday, he is working on iSCSI.
That's no argument against the fact that _others_ work on kfreebsd-9.
> The debian-installer for KfreeBSD should be radical rewritten.
That's the first time I hear about this.
> And Jails should be implemented.
I think, keeping up with upstream is more important that making single
(I though don't know the answer to Robert's question.)
> Also needs the FreeBSD project needs manpower to fix VIMAGE
We are not the FreeBSD project. So that shouldn't be relevant either.
> and to develop resource-limitations for Jails.
Sounds to me like a subfeature of a feature.
,''`. | Axel Beckert <email@example.com>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5