RE: Bug#628800: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: libdjvulibre.so: undefined reference to symbol 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.3'
I believe Michael is right and I'll change that tonight.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barak A. Pearlmutter [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 4:45 PM
> To: Michael Biebl
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Leon Bottou
> Subject: Re: Bug#628800: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: libdjvulibre.so: undefined
> reference to symbol 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.3'
> > I just wanted to mention, that there is a difference between
> > *kfreebsd*-yes (my proposed patch)
> > and
> > *freebsd*-yes (what was merged upstream )
> > afaik the freebsds don't use the glibc userland and I'm not sure if
> > the thread libs on freebsd behave like the one on kfreebsd, so I just
> > wanted to verify that what you merged upstream is intentional and the
> > missing 'k' is not an oversight.
> I'm not sure: upstream did that patch independently of yours, and I saw it
> looked about the same and blindly merged it.
> I'm CCing this message to upstream to let it be addressed directly.
> But I will close with a parenthetical grouse: isn't this exactly the sort
> system-by-system manual non-future-proof groveling that autotools is
> supposed to abolish? Could this be tested automatically using existing
> autoconf macros?