On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:59:03AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Aurelien's segfault fix  seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it to
> > BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate? I don't know if GNU/kFreeBSD
> > bugs are considered RC these days...).
> Does it really segfault on your machine? It shouldn't as it uses
> snprintf. In my case, the displayed name was just broken.
> If it doesn't segfault on your machine, I think it deserves a severity
Ok, I readjusted it.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- From: Robert Millan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Re: Parted
- From: Aurelien Jarno <email@example.com>