Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?

To: Konstantinos Koukopoulos <kouk@noc.uoa.gr>
Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?
From: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:21:03 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0611141404350.1361@sci.felk.cvut.cz>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 52888.195.134.100.30.1163503022.squirrel@webmail.uoa.gr>
References: <[🔎] 52888.195.134.100.30.1163503022.squirrel@webmail.uoa.gr>

Attached is an updated version of the patch for 3.5.5-2. It follows the
advice in PORTING [3] about using wildcards like 'linux-any' in
build-depends.


Unfortunately, the support for linux-any is currently only in dpkg :-(

The "WARNING: please note that this functionality is still not supportedby debhelper" is still valid, so please use rather

Architecture: i386 ia64 alpha amd64 arm hppa m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc
libiw-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64]

I will also file a bug against kdenetwork including this patch


There a few packages in unreleased without submit in BTS,
see http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/NOTES.

Please, after filling bug(s), add also kfreebsd tag by
mail to "request@bugs.debian.org" with body like

user glibc-bsd-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertag 341837 + kfreebsd
usertag 341629 + kfreebsd

Thanks

	Petr

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?
  - From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>

References:
- kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?
  - From: "Konstantinos Koukopoulos" <kouk@noc.uoa.gr>

Prev by Date: Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?
Next by Date: Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?
Previous by thread: Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?
Next by thread: Re: kdenetwork, patch need revision or filing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread