Re: conflict with ioctl.h and ioccom.h?
On Sat 18 Nov 2006 14:07, Petr Salinger wrote:
> > While going through some of the packages in NOTES  I noticed that the
> > darkice package is FTBFS again after being claimed fixed. It used to be
> > FTBFS because of bad build-deps but now it is something different:
> > from the build log :
> It looks like we are currently doing the same thing :-(
> Look at r1727 on
I see. Well I suppose we should be doing different things then, maybe I'll
focus on the packages with no bug in BTS. Btw darkice's build-deps need the
same fix for kfreebsd-amd64 and hurd-i386 as it did for kfreebsd-i386. Should
I reopen the bug and add this information?