Re: Status of various major things
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 11:05:51PM +0000, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> > I'd believe it. Another reason to use 3.0 as the default, if I can make it
> > work. Sadly, NetBSD still uses egcs 2.91 as it's default compiler, so I have
> > no idea if we might need 2.95 as a kernel compiler. Hopefully we can get
> > the kernel patched to be clean for 3.0, if it's not. I guess we'll see.
>
> NetBSD-current uses 2.95.3, and I've seen a chunk of commits go
> by on the NetBSD lists regarding fixing extra warnings detected
> by gcc 3.0, so you may find it easier than you expect :)
Fair enough; I'm working from a base of 1.5.2, with the only -current stuff
being taken from /usr/pkgsrc. Current status on 3.0: 3.0.4ds1 (the package
version) breaks. I'm trying to use CVS HEAD, but the patches are being a
royal pain in the rear to massage into applying. We'll see what I can get
out of it at the end.
--
***************************************************************************
Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com
lucifer@lightbearer.com http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/
Reply to: