Re: PAM 0.75 in experimental at next dinstall run
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Hi. I have just uploaded pam_0.75-1 to experimental. This release is
> mostly just a porting heads up release for people to test and make
> sure that their applications still build, that PAM still minimally
> works and that I haven't introduced some horrible packaging bug.
What is the level of minimal working that you are discussing here, above which
we shouldn't file bugs?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com