Re: libc strategy
On Mon, 02 Jul 2001 17:31:18 -0700
Will Yardley <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> it seems to me that these are two different things since bsd isn't a
> hardware type; it's a kernel and operating system. so it seems to me
> that 'debian-bsd' should be something different from 'debian-sparc' or
> 'debian-alpha' since it's not using a linux kernel.
> seems like it would be make more sense to use stuff that is already part
> of *bsd where possible (UFS, libc, bsd utilities) but take a debian
> approach to development and packaging etc.
There is not argument here, using ext2 would be plain stupid, and it's already decided
that we're not porting glibc.