Re: Re: Debian BSD.. cool idea
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:51:45PM -0500, Dan Papasian wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:36:52PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Perhaps fork is the wrong term for a split which occurred because
> > the primary author did a rewrite.
> Primary author of what?
What did Jolitz write?
> "BSD system" can mean many things. But if you mean the definition that
> I think you mean, then why is it any more reasonable to expect BSD to
> become a Linux system (In the case of Debian/FreeBSD) then it is to
> expect Linux to become a BSD system?
I'm just pointing out that the criticisms of Linux sound more like
statements that Linux should be BSD than critiques of the architecture.
But this conversation grows fragmented -- I fear its only direction
has been responses to perceived criticisms.