On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:26:06AM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote: > >britney says > > > > partman-nbd/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb > > partman-nbd/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb > > > >but I guess that's always been the case? > > Hmmm. That's surprising (to me). Ah, looking at the nbd package I can > see that the udeb is not "Architecture: any" or even "Architecture: > linux-any" like I'd expect. That's why. Wouter, could you fix that or > at least add armhf and s390x please? Sure. I keep forgetting about nbd-client-udeb; it often needs the same changes that nbd-client needs, but it's this teeny tiny thing that's just an appendix to nbd... oh well. Fix uploaded. It also contains a tightening of the build-dependencies to what's effectively already there (but not specified as such in the changelog), but (other than the Architecture: linux-any) no functional changes. Please unblock, so the fix can go in. unblock nbd/1:3.2-2 Thanks, -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature