Re: Towards X11-based d-i: Gone through NEW
On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm not sure whether it's feasible to push everything up to the
> “libvte9-udeb, libgtk2.0-0-udeb, libpango1.0-udeb, gtk2-engines-udeb”
> layer, that would break cdebconf-gtk-{entropy,terminal,udeb}?
That's not a problem as those udebs are currently unused in testing.
It simply means that people will not yet be able to build G-I images from
testing, but that is not a problem. It is infinitely more important not to
break the existing alpha1 release.
> If that sounds fine, just asking release folks to force the new
> packages in would do?
IMO breaking some dependencies for packages that are unused anyway is
preferable to the risk of breaking alpha1.
Reply to: