Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes

To: Debian Boot <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes
From: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:40:39 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] be7a9f3d1002211840x3ec2ce72i9bb57896ab9b3c2d@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201002220333.44395.elendil@planet.nl>
References: <[🔎] E1NjNkx-0004cq-VF@ries.debian.org> <[🔎] 201002220333.44395.elendil@planet.nl>

Hello,

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:

This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in unstable.

I noticed it after I uploaded, see the other mail I sent to the ml.

If Bastian cannot upload busybox tomorrow I can upload it or a new netcfg adding dhcp3-client-udeb dependency for all arches as a work-around.

Cheers,

--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br

Reply to:

References:
- Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes
  - From: Archive Administrator <dak@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

Prev by Date: Processing of preseed_1.44_amd64.changes
Next by Date: Processing of user-setup_1.29_amd64.changes
Previous by thread: Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes
Next by thread: [RFH] Next Debian Installer release
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread