Quoting Cord Beermann (email@example.com): > Hallo! Du (Christian Perrier) hast geschrieben: > > > A few enhancements I would propose to listmasters (or anyone behind > > the review tool): > > > > - have a display mode for the list archives where messages already > > "nominated" would be shown in a different way (maybe sorting messages > > by number of spam nominations?). That would help those people who > > review archives after 1 or 2 people already did it to spot possible > > spam more easily > > Although i don't understand fully your suggestion i fear that this > would lead to less quality in the review, because Reviewers would rely > on other Reviewers. Yes, this is what I was suggesting, roughly. Making it easier to spot out what has more probability to be spam. I agree this makes reviewers depend on other reviewers, so that can be seen as debatable..:) > > > - allow reviewing more than 10 nominated posts at a time. This is > > probably what slows me down the most when reviewing. For the record, > > this morning, I spent about 40 minutes reviewing 550 nominated posts. > > I chose 10 because i think thats a value that doesn't drive away > 'part-time' reviewers. But I think about providing pages with more. *that* would help a lot. > > > - allow coming back on messages one once rated as "Unsure" > > Once a week (Sunday 6:00 GMT) a job runs which picks up all ratings > and remove the articles and things. After that articles rated as > 'Unsure' will be displayed again. Oh, that's perfect, in such case.
Description: Digital signature