Le lundi 23 juin 2008 à 11:50 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > > If you use gnome, it will always be pulled by epiphany-extensions > > anyway. > > It seemed to me that epiphany-extensions depends on epiphany-gecko, but > that epiphany-browser was not pulled in by that. The epiphany-browser package only contains the /usr/bin/epiphany wrapper script, which is only here for backwards compatibility, so no need for it on new installations. > > Upstream made the choice for us. Now that swfdec-gnome is part of the > > official GNOME release (see gnome-desktop-environment), swfdec-mozilla > > is only here to bring the browser on par with the desktop’s abilities. > > There's a big difference between choosing to use swfdec to display flash > files from Desktop, and using it to display flash files from the whole > web. Has the GNOME project really decided to use swfdec in browsers by > default? All I was aware of was them having decided to use swfdec-gnome > so far. As GNOME is moving away from Gecko, they are not promoting technologies tied to it, but given that GNOME developers are working on swfdec, I think it is only a matter of time until epiphany integrates swfdec one way or another. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=