Re: Regarding: [PATCH] add -versatile flavour to linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:52:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 01-03-2008 om 11:54 schreef Robert Millan:
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 12:30:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > On Saturday 01 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > Alternatively, if you can setup ACLs that would restrict my commit rights
> > > > to win32-loader/ directory, I would feel comfortable with that.
> > >
> > > I would not. I would feel extremely uncomfortable if we had to micromanage
> > > things like that. All I'm looking for is some selfrestraint and
> > > selfcontrol.
> > I can use selfcontrol, but it is you who threatened to remove my commit perms,
> > which is not about selfcontrol. My point is, that if you want to handle this
> > by using technical restrictions, I have no problem with the one described above.
> First: Be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you receive.
> For what _I see_ is that fjp and rmh don't have a fight, at least they
> share a common goal: the best Debian-Installer!
> And _I_ also see the "differences in their user interfaces"
> One could say that that is a serious problem,
> I rather call it a challenge for this project.
> It is up to all of us that project members accept each other.
> The very least thing we should keep in mind is that
> it takes two for a fight.
I can accept Frans as a person, and I can accept the rules in D-I. However, I
cannot accept that making a minor mistake may lead me to very stressful
situations in which I'm publicly humiliated. Last night I slept badly, and
I've been all day in a bad mood. I'm only human, so if I see that this is not
affordable for me, chances are I might end being alienated from D-I.
And yet, I think Frans is capable of doing much better if he wants to.
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)