On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Joey Hess wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > BTW, could it be that this comment in pkg-lists/exclude is obsolete? > > # some arches and versions of glibc link against libgcc1, > > # it will be pulled in via library reduction > > libgcc1 - > > > > If I scan all current udebs I find no dependencies on libgcc*. > > Have you ldd's the libc on all arches? AFAIK libgcc1 is used on some 64 > bit arches or such. No. I only checked the dependencies of all udebs. Shouldn't it show up as a dependency of libc*-udeb for those arches? [...] Ah, no. I see that the glibc control file for libc*-udebs does not contain any Depends: lines (and neither does libc6 itself). Oh, well. There's probably a good reason for that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.