On Saturday 03 November 2007, Joey Hess wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > Isn't debconf-apt-progress used unconditionally now? Yep. Old comment. > debconf-apt-progress --config shouldn't be needed here. Like I did in my > apt-setup patch, it should be ok here to just use: OK. Wasn't aware of that. Tested and seems to work fine without. Both corrected. Thx.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.