Rick Thomas wrote: > Ahhh... So the installer time-setter uses rdate, not NTP? A wise choice, > now that I think about it. Much lighter weight protocol, and the client is > much *much* smaller. > > Infact, rdate doesn't even use SNTP. rdate, as used by the installer, uses SNTP. > The point remains. The uncertainty in the time from the server is > proportional (or worse) to the network delay. Not with SNTP it isn't, AFAIK. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature