Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:07:05 -0400 with message-id <20071012190705.GA23639@kitenet.net> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: problem with 2.6 netboot and sbp2
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:52:22 -0400
- Message-id: <20040802215222.GA4617@kitenet.net>
Package: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 Severity: normal Tags: d-i The i386 2.6 netboot initrd has sbp2 on it frm firewire-core-modules, but not the scsi stuff that depends on. (This is arguably a bug in the kernel module udebs for not splitting it, or the initrd for not including scsi). When hw-detect finds that firewire is available, it loads sbp2 and displays an error when the modprobe fails due to the missing module. All is well on the second hw-detect run after the missing modules are loaded. I think the best fix would be to split sbp2 out into its own or a different udeb so it's not on initrds that only have network drivers. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- see shy joAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 263075-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: closing
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:07:05 -0400
- Message-id: <20071012190705.GA23639@kitenet.net>
The netboot initrd contains scsi-core-modules, so this seems fixed. -- see shy joAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---