[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#423449: marked as done (keep (serial) gettys around)



Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2007 09:23:33 +0200
with message-id <200705160923.34038.elendil@planet.nl>
and subject line Bug#423449: keep (serial) gettys around
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: finish-install
Version: 2.10
Severity: wishlist

#274649 modified finish-install to have the finished system start a getty on
the serial port used for installation and update /etc/securetty so root can
log into it (thank you!).

At the same time, it disables the gettys on the local console (tty[1-6]).
We often install via serial console with ipmitool(1), but also use the local
console from time to time. It would be nice if finish-install simply kept
these gettys around, or offered an option to do so (perhaps a debconf
question that we could preseed?).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 12 May 2007 00:45, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2007 23:53, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > My wish is to keep the serial gettys when done a "keyboard install".
>
> What exactly do you mean by this? Create serial getties even when the
> install is not done over serial console?
>
> Which serial port would you want to use for that? What happens if there
> is not another computer connected to that serial port but some other
> device?

Closing this BR as AFAICT the request is invalid and there was no reply to 
my questions.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: