Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 17:10:20 -0400 with message-id <20070510211020.GA28442@kitenet.net> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Please add pata_artop module for Iomega NAS100d
- From: Rod Whitby <rod@whitby.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:33:09 +1030
- Message-id: <4580DB0D.3080509@whitby.id.au>
Package: kernel-wedge Version: 2.29 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: tbm@cyrius.com Porting the debian installer to the ixp4xx/nas100d requires the pata_artop module (which depends on libata) be added to the installer image. The question is whether it is simply added to sata-modules (it uses the new SATA/PATA libata subsystem, but is not actually a SATA controller), or whether a new pata-modules udeb is created, with libata being split out into an ata-common-modules udeb. I'm going to continue testing by simply adding it to sata-modules, but will be happy to migrate to comply with whatever you decide. This is not etch-critical :-) -- Rod
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 403016-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: fixed
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:10:20 -0400
- Message-id: <20070510211020.GA28442@kitenet.net>
I fixed this bug by accident recently when I added a pata-modules udeb that includes pata_artop. :-) -- see shy joAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---