Re: RFC/lenny: /lib/partman/check.d
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:54:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 16:27, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I think it would make partman a bit easier to use if we added a check.d
> > directory run before we ask the user to confirm changes and then run
> > commit.d (only when preparing to exit partman, not e.g. when committing
> > changes in order to configure LVM) and moved all the finish.d scripts
> > with numbers less than 20 there.
> The basic idea and changes in the partman script seem sane enough to me.
> Maybe checks that can only be performed after committing (if there are
> any) could stay in finish.d.
Right, there's no harm in them staying there even e.g. if there's some
> Feel free to investigate further and set up a migration path.
Migration path is easy: do partman-base first and then do everything
else, marking them as needing partman-base for migration to testing.
Colin Watson [email@example.com]