On Tuesday 13 February 2007 00:30, Steve Langasek wrote: > I don't follow this. Why is it wrong to upload fixes for *any* > translations as time allows? Translation fixes ought to be considered > on their own merits and on whether they interfere with the release > process, not by whether someone would consider it "unfair" to other > languages. Because we are frozen for the release of RC2; you have to draw the line somewhere. The fact that RC2 is taken longer than expected is making me consider to unfreeze D-I again and in that case all translations that have committed changes since the start of the freeze should benefit, and not just French. Committing fixes in components manually for only one language would effectively be unfair to other languages that also have pending translation updates in the master PO file. If we're going to allow updates, it should be for all languages and all components and then it makes more sense to do this in bulk just before migrating udebs to testing. There is also updating the Etch branch to take care of. Please trust me to manage this properly.
Description: PGP signature