On Friday 12 January 2007 17:10, Sven Luther wrote: > reopen 392764 > # Clueless closing of this bug, probably due to a confusion with > another, # separate, but similar bug. > thanks > > Frans, you know that i did open two bugs, because those where two > separate issues, right ? Did you even bother to READ the main reason that I closed this BR: > > Closing this bug report as the issue was traced to a bug in parted > > (#392767) which has been solved in the mean time. I don't see _any_ evidence in the report that there is still an issue after #392767 was solved. _You_ identified #392767 as the root cause of this BR after all.
Attachment:
pgpQonvhZ_4Ek.pgp
Description: PGP signature