On Wednesday 22 November 2006 20:59, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:50:37PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > I wonder why prep is promoted to a general subarch here rather than > > a subarch for powerpc only as it was previously. > > Because, as i have told already in the past, prep didn't make the > ARCH=powerpc switch upstream, so has to build with ARCH=ppc, so is > using a different kernel flavour. Yes, I got there myself too. See my previous mail. > The SUBARCHES variable is only used for mkvmlinuz invocation though, > and you cannot really make any conclusion about what is listed there. Right. Looks like that could be simplified as there are no real subarches left anymore.
Description: PGP signature