[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#381258: install report etchbeta



Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: <Fill in date and from where you got the image>
 | Netinstall.iso debian.org 8/1/06
uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
Date: <Date and time of the install>
| Tuesday 8/1/06, approx 4-6 pm PDT
Method: How did you install?  What did you boot off?  If network
      install, from where?  Proxied?
| CD Boot, network install at library public WAP, no proxie
| note : i told installer to take slice off my /home partition = OK
Machine: <Description of machine (eg, IBM Thinkpad R32)>
| powerpc pismo powerbook3,1
Processor:
| ppc7410, altivec (apple upgrade)
Memory: 576 MB
Root Device: <IDE?  SCSI?  Name of device?>
| ide, hda
Root Size/partition table:  Feel free to paste the full partition
      table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.
| see notes
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
| see notes
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [0 ]
Configure network HW:   [0 ]
Config network:         [ ]
Detect CD:              [0 ]
Load installer modules: [0 ]
Detect hard drives:     [0 ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [ ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [0]
Reboot:                 [0]

Comments/Problems:

<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
      and ideas you had during the initial install.>
IMHO: "standard" install is too big a gap with desktop. installation guide
describes two intermediate tasks: "work console", "developer" --
where are they ? these just happen to be my purposes.

lspci command needs to be installed manually via package "pciutils". also parted
is missing: perhaps both are in the di-utils packages, get erased ???  again
xorg install fails from "standard", although it worked after i copied the xorg.cfg
file from my sarge upgrade i saved this time. i was tempted to try and build
up this system further but after sleeping on it i decided it was too risky.
starting up the computer, i tried to apt-get parted and the mirror was unavailable.
the installer had not given me option to set up an alternate mirror, so i zapped my
pram/nvram and went back to my old system.

installer continues to inflict minor damages upon my macos (both X and classic)
partitions, fixable but a pain and worrisome. sarge never did this.

if i were given a machine with a clean/wiped disk drive to install debian etch,
at this point i would continue the method of install sarge first and test, then
upgrade to etch, as the most reliable method. as the installation guide tells
us that is an established method.



Reply to: