[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#380997 closed by Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> (Re: Bug#380997: no archive for debian-boot 2006/08)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:33:35AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #380997: no archive for debian-boot 2006/08,
> which was filed against the listarchives package.
> 
> It has been closed by Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>.
> 
> Their explanation is attached below.
<snip/>
> On Tuesday 01 August 2006 12:41, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > While being on the road, I noticed
> > there is _no_ http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/08/threads.html
> > a http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/07/threads.html does exist.
> > (for previous months also)
> >
> > Could that index page be created?
> 
> Fixed, though it was not a d-boot specific problem. The initial assignment 
> to debian-installer was completely bogus.
> 
> IMO, as a DD you really can be expected to know how to properly submit bug 
> reports against Debian's basic services.


Hi Frans,

Thanks for fixing it. Also thanks for pissing me off.
It really helped to state that the bug was reported against
the "wrong" package. Now I can whine that during the submit
was mentioned that I was on the road and that I asked for for
re-assigning the BR.
Telling that a DD doesn't meets another DD expections is also good,
it does state who is the better Debian Developer, which does give a warm
feeling to the Elite. And they really deserve that, it should happen
often. But no worries, I'll fail the next time better  :-)


Cheers
Geert Stappers

P.S.

I don't fore see that I get routine in submitting BRs against Debian's
basic services. They are well maintained. My appriciation to you
and the other maintainers.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEz8tVOSINbgwa/7sRAgkdAJ9T05zvmqwLs1IovxtzzGI1Aa97hgCgsVjg
t+Kki5QKDYSfNjcxPP9Nnno=
=QKoS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: