Hi, On Friday 14 July 2006 14:55, Rick Thomas wrote: > This bug (258545) can be closed as "wont fix". It's not reasonable > (or possible -- I think) to do what I wanted and what your revised > bug title asks for. We can detect hfs-partitions, thats where bootx lives. os-prober already does this. Now the thing left to do is to find bootx :) IIRC (please correct / add more details) it's in a directory called bootx? And there is a bootx binary of which name? > What has been done recently (making d-i install > quik instead of yaboot on OldWorld machines, and accommodating BootX > users by making "install bootloader" skip-able in "expert" mode) is > an acceptable substitute. Ok, if it's not possible to detect an existing bootx installation, what I somewhat doubt, I'll close it then. But first I'll wait for your reply :) > > Please provide a patch for a better wording. > I don't believe it's reasonable to ask for changes to BootX, but > that's where the bug is. The wording in the d-i message is fine the > way it is. Sorry if I made it sound that there was something wrong > with d-i. Ah, ok :) regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpqUmE_jl3CW.pgp
Description: PGP signature