Re: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:22:00PM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
> > The "regular" and "-directfb" lib and -dev packages would need to be
> > co-installable on a regular Debian system.
> >
> > Sorry if we did not make this clear enough.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > FJP
> >
> > (Anybody please correct me if any of this is incorrect!)
>
>
> That's excatly what I was about to write;
> I'll rephrase it just in case it miight be useful :
>
> 1)non-directfb packages not needed by the installer (no udeb is needed)
> - libcairo2_1.1.6-1_i386.deb
> - libcairo2-dev_1.1.6-1_i386.deb
>
> 2) directfb packages
>
> - libcairo2-directfb_1.1.6-1_i386.deb
> Runtime library in case anyone will use directfb application on their
> host
> (actually this is not strictly needed for g-I itself)
Don't we need also a -fPIC version of the library, in order to the mklibs
reduction ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: