Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:22:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200605160922.23221.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060516070110.GB25951@gpm.stappers.nl>
References: <[🔎] 200605130504.24677.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20060516063309.GA18668@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] 20060516070110.GB25951@gpm.stappers.nl>

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:01, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Fool^WFull switch to g-i will kill serial line and ssh installs.

Not so. The installer detects serial line installs and does not enable the 
framebuffer and thus not the graphical frontend. Similar for ssh 
installs.

Attachment: pgpSmYr8jrtmI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers)

References:
- [G-I] Udeb dependency resolution issue resolved!
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers)

Prev by Date: Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Next by Date: Re: graphics or text as default?
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread