Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:12:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200605160812.05437.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060515133240.GH7686@slurp>
References: <[🔎] 200605130504.24677.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 200605151521.39656.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20060515133240.GH7686@slurp>

On Monday 15 May 2006 15:32, Davide Viti wrote:
> I did one hour ago or so and it booted fine

Hmm. I'm guessing that you've tried the mini.iso, and not one of the 
larger images as they indeed were completely broken. Will hopefully be 
fixed with the next build.

Attachment: pgpX1l19l1SeR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Davide Viti <zinosat@tiscali.it>

References:
- [G-I] Udeb dependency resolution issue resolved!
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Davide Viti <zinosat@tiscali.it>

Prev by Date: Re: graphics or text as default?
Next by Date: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread