Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer

To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
From: Davide Viti <zinosat@tiscali.it>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:32:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060515133240.GH7686@slurp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200605151521.39656.elendil@planet.nl>
References: <[🔎] 200605130504.24677.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 200605150837.00615.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20060515072837.GB2957@einval.com> <[🔎] 200605151521.39656.elendil@planet.nl>

Hi Frans,

On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:21:28PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I think that should already be fixed by Joey. Any chance of a rerun for 
> i386?

I did one hour ago or so and it booted fine

regards,
Davide

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

References:
- [G-I] Udeb dependency resolution issue resolved!
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: powerpc daily sid_d-i CD builds working again
Next by Date: Re: graphics or text as default?
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
Next by thread: Re: Proposal for integration of the graphical installer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread