Re: note on "2.4 is deprecated"
On 13 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:28:56AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> That is stretching it. The third component of a version is
>> hardly a "major" revision.
>
> Why?
Component in a version are major.minor.sub. Now, given that
Linux 1.0 was ages ago, one could conced that the versioning is
Epoch.Major.Minor But claiming that 2.5.16 is majorly different from
2.5.15 when it comews to support is a facile argument that most
people are not gonna buy.
manoj
--
"It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be
coming up it." -- Henry Allen
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: