On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:20:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 06 February 2006 12:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > You're talking about the Beta2 release here, right? As in, there's > > still going to be a possibility to fix the release afterwards? > > Yes. Though missing a d-i release cannot be good from a release > recertification point of view. Well the only problem I see for missing the beta 2 release would be whether or not we can fix aptitude (or whatever is causing aptitude to break), thus making base installable again. 2.6.15-4 will hit the archive today and hopefully I'll upload the corresponding udebs today. Although from what I'm hearing, we'll probably want a 4.1 pretty soon. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature