Hi all, > > > Is a better solution for checking the presence of the parameter > > > possible? > > This should fix the issue with <XXXX--invertYYY> being equivalent to > <--invert> and also should fix the missing "endif" in the last if > statement. IMO the option name "--invert" is really measleading for a script which defaults excluding some ranges (which is already not too natural and definitely too explicit) My idea was something like "--include" / "--exclude" intended as "include mode" (when the glyphs in the ranges specified are meant to be _kept_) "exlcude mode" when you specify which ranges you want to exclude regards, Davide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature