[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#341054: cdebconf-gtk: Add support for info message



On Tuesday 06 December 2005 14:26, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Well, one thing i apreciate a lot in the newt frontend is the ability
> to rapidly complete an installation using the keys and also i've
> noticed myself using the keyboard instead of the mouse whenver i could
> during the (many :) test instalations i did in the past months (this is
> the reason why i've added the <ESC> key functionality to the GTK
> frontend).

Me too :-)

> I also think that, starting from his second installation, an user would
> like to be able to use keyboard to install debian faster than before
> since he's already confident with the debian installation procedures.

It should of course be documented in the Installation Guide. I think most 
users will be able to find the available keyboard shortcuts.
<TAB> and <Enter> are intuitive enough. Escape is used so seldom that just 
tabbing to the button is an acceptable alternative IMO for those who 
can't find the <Esc> key shortcut.

The only one I had to search for a bit is <+> to expand the country list.

Another option especially suitable for the graphical installer is a small 
help icon somewhere that would pop-up a help screen which could show the 
shortcuts. I still don't see any reason to list them on the main screen.

> what do you think is the best arrangement?
>
> [1] https://debian.polito.it/downloads/message_statusbar.png
> [2] https://debian.polito.it/downloads/message_label.png

Well, I prefer [1]. But then again, see my earlier comments :-P

> [3] https://debian.polito.it/downloads/message_label_rescue.png

Rescue mode could be a bit bigger and maybe could even be put on top of 
the logo (upper right corner), maybe with a border around it 
(automatically grow to the left) when an info text is dispayed.

Even without the help text, I feel the info text should be at the top of 
the screen.

Attachment: pgp_dpP1O5glq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: