On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:25:36PM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 07:33:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 04:29:50PM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
5. A graphical partitioner is probably the biggest missing peice, I
didn't really test how the partitioner came through, just did a "wipe
entire disk" and it was still a pain.
AFAIK xavier oswald was trying to merge gparted nto the graphical d-i
and making it run with GTKDFB, but i haven't had news from him from a
week or two..
It will need gtk-dfb 2.8.x, since gparted is built using newer widgets not
found in 2.0.x
And udebs containing libstdc++, libsigc++, libglibmm and a version of
libgtkmm
built against libgtk-directfb. libglibmm the maintainer was ready to
upload,
but it needs the two first ones first, and doko has not replied about
libstdc++ yet.
i hope libgtkmm/libglibmm are not so tied to X as was libvte, that i
once wanted to use in the g-i to provide a terminal without the need to
do VT switching.
I don't think so, libglibmm is pure text at least, and i believe libgtkmm to
be buildable against libgtk. After all, libgtkmm are just C++ bindings for
libgtk, but i may be wrong, we will see.
If we could compile libvte against libgtk+-directfb we could also
include a VT into the g-i.
Yep. What where the problem with it ?