Joey Hess wrote: > I don't actually see any problem with 2.6.13 reaching sid before the d-i > beta. If would of course be disastrous if it reached etch before the > beta, since it's certian to break d-i etc etc but that's what RC bugs > are for. Well, aside from the problem that it assumes that the current 2.6.12 release is fully usble for the d-i beta; and if that release isn't, fixed debs and udebs would need to be uploaded directly to testing somehow. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature