Re: Bug#328130: RM: please remove any remnant of 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels from etch/sid
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > (...)
> Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather
> than later
I hope so too :)
> With regards to pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386.
> I notice that pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-i386 exists and presumably works.
> I've CCed the maintainer, Per Olofsson for comment.
Ok, either way, since 2.4.27 exists, I won't let pcmcia-modules-2.4.26 block
removal.
> > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64
> >
> > Ditto -- shouldn't this one be simply superseded by packages generated by a
> > next upload of linux-2.6?
>
> amd64 still doesn't seem to exist for linux-2.6, I'm not sure why,
> perhaps I am just blind or looking in the wrong place
>
> http://ftp2.jp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/
>
> However, once it is uploaded, it will have binary packages with
> the same names as those previously produced by the
> kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 source package. Does this mean that
> kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 will automatically be removed, or automatically
> flagged for removal?
Yes, if all binary packages of a give source package are 'hijacked' by another
package, the source package will be automatically flagged for removal, and
packages automatically flagged for removal will be removed by an ftp-team
member every few days.
So, no action needed, and not removing will ensure a smooth transition.
> Thanks
Thanks you,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Reply to: