Colin Watson wrote: > Fabio Massimo di Nitto did a bunch of work on partman-auto-lvm in Ubuntu > (http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/pal/) to make it work more smoothly > and perhaps be usable as a default partitioning method; I'd like to get > these changes back to mainline d-i (and I committed a few of the simple > and obvious ones this afternoon). > > However, some of the changes require LVM2. Are we in a position where we > can just say that if you want to use partman-auto-lvm then you have to > use LVM2, or do we still have to maintain LVM1 compatibility? I see no reason to worry about supporting lvm1. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature