17 серпня 2005 о 15:09 +0200 Christian Perrier написав(-ла): > > > Is it correct? If it is, we have some more glyphs to add, also there is > > newt that do not support that symbol correctly (but it will be easy to > > make a patch, I'll do this). AFAIK Christian Perrier have done some work > > about font, but he has holidays now. > > > Yes..:-)..and my holidays are still running, so to answer Arash's > question, nothing happened. > > What needs to be done is adding all characters mentioned by Eugenyi to > needed-characters/fa... > > Then we need those glyphs in the bterm-unifont font and *that* is > tricky..:-) That may be not so tricky. I checked bdf font from package "unifont" and it contains all needed glyphs for Persian. As about Punjabi, I think it will be impossible to have font with good quality with bterm - with gtk frontend it looks much better. -- Eugeniy Meshcheryakov Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University Information and Computing Centre http://icc.univ.kiev.ua
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature