Hi, 15 серпня 2005 о 14:14 +0430 Arash Bijanzadeh написав(-ла): > The bug is still there, missing glyphs include: > 06CC , 06AF, 06A9,0698,0686 > Just remember that we have several glyphs for each . i am attaching a file > including all the missing glyphs That file does not contain all missing glyphs. It contain only basic glyphs without presentaion forms (even if it does not looks so): $ unicode -s `cat missing` U+06CC ARABIC LETTER FARSI YEH UTF-8: db 8c UTF-16BE: 06cc Decimal: ی Category: Lo (Letter, Other) Bidi: AL (Right-to-Left Arabic) U+06CC ARABIC LETTER FARSI YEH UTF-8: db 8c UTF-16BE: 06cc Decimal: ی Category: Lo (Letter, Other) Bidi: AL (Right-to-Left Arabic) U+06CC ARABIC LETTER FARSI YEH UTF-8: db 8c UTF-16BE: 06cc Decimal: ی Category: Lo (Letter, Other) Bidi: AL (Right-to-Left Arabic) U+06AF ARABIC LETTER GAF UTF-8: da af UTF-16BE: 06af Decimal: گ Category: Lo (Letter, Other) Bidi: AL (Right-to-Left Arabic) .... So file 'missing' contains: U+06CC (YEH) U+06AF (GAF) U+06A9 (KEHEH) U+0686 (TCHEH) U+0698 (JEH) Those characters have some forms, lets guess: SIMPLE ISOLATED FINAL MEDIAL INITIAL U+06CC U+FBFC U+FBFD U+FBFF U+FBFE U+06AF U+FB92 U+FB93 U+FB95 U+FB94 U+06A9 U+FB8E U+FB8F U+FB90 U+FB8F U+0686 U+FB7A U+FB7B U+FB7D U+FB7C U+0698 U+FB8A U+FB8B - - Is it correct? If it is, we have some more glyphs to add, also there is newt that do not support that symbol correctly (but it will be easy to make a patch, I'll do this). AFAIK Christian Perrier have done some work about font, but he has holidays now. -- Eugeniy Meshcheryakov Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University Information and Computing Centre http://icc.univ.kiev.ua
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature